Arrest under Section 35(6) BNSS – Supreme Court’s Clear Warning Against Routine Arrests
“The power of arrest under Section 35(6) of the BNSS, 2023 is to be exercised rather sparingly and is not a matter of routine, but an exception.”
— Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh
Source: Supreme Court of India
Why in News?
In Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation (2026), the Supreme Court delivered a very important clarification on the power of arrest under Section 35(6) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
The Court clearly held that:
-
Arrest under Section 35(6) cannot be automatic
-
Police cannot rely on old reasons which already existed when a notice under Section 35(3) was issued
-
Arrest is allowed only if fresh material or new circumstances arise
This judgment strengthens personal liberty and puts clear limits on police arrest powers under the new criminal law.
Background of the Case Explained Simply
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) replaced the old Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). One of its main aims is to reduce unnecessary arrests.
What does Section 35(3) BNSS say?
-
For offences punishable with imprisonment up to seven years
-
Police must normally issue a notice of appearance
-
The accused is required to appear before the police instead of being arrested immediately
This notice system is meant to protect citizens from harassment and arbitrary arrest.
What does Section 35(6) BNSS provide?
Section 35(6) allows arrest only in limited situations, such as:
-
When the person fails to comply with the notice under Section 35(3), or
-
When the person refuses to identify himself
But the law never intended this provision to become a shortcut for arrest.
What Happened in the Earlier Satender Kumar Antil Case (2025)?
In Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (II), 2025, the same Bench held that:
-
Non-compliance with a notice does not automatically justify arrest
-
Arrest must always be a last resort
-
Police must apply their mind and justify the necessity of arrest
However, one question remained unanswered:
Can police arrest a person under Section 35(6) using the same reasons that already existed when the notice was issued?
This is the gap that the 2026 judgment fills.
Core Legal Issue Before the Court
The key question was:
Can the police rely on the same circumstances that existed at the time of issuing a Section 35(3) notice to later arrest a person under Section 35(6)?
Supreme Court’s Clear Answer
The Court answered with a firm NO.
Key Observations of the Court
-
Old grounds cannot justify arrest
Circumstances that already existed at the time of issuing the notice cannot be reused to arrest the person later. -
Fresh material is mandatory
Arrest under Section 35(6) is valid only when new facts or materials emerge after issuing the notice. -
Arrest is an exception, not the rule
The Court strongly stated that arrest under Section 35(6) must be rare and cautious. -
Police must act slowly and carefully
Officers are expected to be circumspect and restrained, not mechanical or routine. -
Notice under Section 35(3) is compulsory
For offences punishable up to seven years, issuing notice is mandatory, not optional.
Meaning of “Fresh Material” in Simple Words
“Fresh material” means:
-
New evidence
-
New conduct of the accused
-
New facts discovered after issuing the notice
Examples:
-
The accused tries to influence witnesses
-
The accused tampers with evidence
-
The accused plans to abscond
-
The accused commits another offence
Without such new developments, arrest is illegal.
Why This Judgment Is Extremely Important
1. Protects Personal Liberty
The ruling reinforces Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life and personal liberty.
2. Prevents Misuse of Police Power
Police can no longer:
-
Issue a notice as a formality
-
Arrest later using the same old reasons
3. Strengthens the BNSS Reform Objective
The BNSS aims to:
-
Reduce unnecessary arrests
-
Promote notice-based investigation
-
Make arrest a last option
This judgment ensures those goals are actually followed.
Key Provisions Related to Arrest under BNSS – Explained Simply
Section 35 BNSS – Power of Arrest Without Warrant
Police can arrest without warrant in specific situations, such as:
-
Cognizable offence committed in police presence
-
Serious offences punishable with more than seven years
-
Proclaimed offenders
-
Possession of stolen property
-
Obstruction of police duty
-
Desertion from Armed Forces
-
Offences committed outside India
-
Breach of conditions by released convicts
-
Requisition by another police officer
Conditional Arrest for Offences Up to Seven Years
For offences punishable up to seven years:
Arrest is allowed only if:
-
Police believe the offence was committed
-
Arrest is necessary to:
-
Prevent further offences
-
Ensure proper investigation
-
Prevent evidence tampering
-
Protect witnesses
-
Secure court appearance
-
Police must record reasons in writing.
Notice of Appearance – A Strong Safeguard
-
If arrest is not required, police must issue notice
-
As long as the person complies:
-
No arrest is allowed
-
-
Arrest after notice requires recorded, fresh reasons
Special Protection for Vulnerable Persons
-
For offences punishable with less than three years:
-
Arrest of persons above 60 years or infirm persons
-
Requires prior permission of DSP-rank officer
-
Final Takeaway
The Supreme Court has sent a strong message:
Arrest is not a routine police tool. It is a serious invasion of liberty and must be justified with fresh, compelling reasons.
Section 35(6) of the BNSS is not a free pass to arrest, but a carefully controlled exception.
This judgment will play a crucial role in shaping future arrest practices under the new criminal laws of India.
COMMENTS